April 7, 2009

Will your references sabotage your job hunt?

Here's an article I just saw on Fortune. Given all the noise the old media co's have been making around re-purposed content, I feel a little guilty about this - but then again, I'm not making any money off it....


Original article can be found here: http://money.cnn.com/2009/04/07/news/economy/references.fortune/index.htm

NEW YORK (Fortune) -- Dear Annie: I've been looking for a job for three months, putting in eight-hour days of contacting people I used to work with, attending industry events, "meeting" people and joining groups on social networking sites, and putting out every other kind of feeler I can think of. I've had a couple of rounds of interviews, but each time, what looked very close to being a solid offer suddenly turned cold.

I've noticed that, both times this happened, it was after the interviewer said he intended to call the people I had given as references. It could be a coincidence, of course, but then again, I'm starting to wonder what my references (two former bosses and a former client who all liked my work, or so I thought) have been saying about me. Your thoughts, please? -Wondering in Winnetka

Dear W.W.: You're right to wonder. Yes, it could be sheer coincidence that both your hot prospects turned chilly after references came into the picture -- and, in this job market, with so many candidates for every job opening, it's entirely possible that those two employers simply found somebody else they regarded as a better fit.

On the other hand, consider for a moment the responses of hiring managers asked to recall the most surprising reference check they'd done lately. Here's a sampling, from Silicon Valley staffing firm The Creative Group, which conducted the survey:

* "Someone used her mother as a reference. Needless to say, she had not worked anywhere with her mother."
* "We learned that the woman we were interviewing liked to go barefoot all day."
* "We talked to someone who said that the applicant didn't like the industry in which he was trying to get a job."
* "The reference said the person fell asleep during work hours."
* "A professor recommended someone who was really smart, but mentioned that he was never seen wearing any footwear besides flip-flops."
* "The reference went on and on about the candidate's favorite music, bars, social activities, etc."
* "The fellow I called just started laughing. He said he could not believe he was a reference for this candidate."

Yikes. No doubt the job applicants under discussion would be mortified to hear these comments. But even far less damaging remarks can undermine your job hunt.

"Even a subtle lack of enthusiasm can work against you," notes Megan Slabinski, The Creative Group's executive director.

Let's try to figure out where your relationships with references may be going awry. A few questions for you:

* Did you let them know beforehand that you would be giving out their names and contact information and listing them as references?
* Have you explained to them what kind of job you're looking for, and what you'd appreciate their emphasizing when employers call?
* Have they got an up-to-date copy of your resume?
* Have you thanked them for being willing to put in a positive word for you, even if no one has called them?
* Have you done them any good turns lately (or ever)?

If you answer "yes" to all of the above, that's a good start. Next consider: Are your references still in the jobs you think they're in?

"Be sure to stay in close contact with references," says Heidi Allison, CEO of Allison & Taylor, a firm that conducts reference checks for job seekers who want to verify what's being said about them. "If the person is no longer there to respond to inquiries, a reference checker may be shuffled around in the company and end up talking to someone who won't cast you in such a positive light."

If everyone's contact information checks out, get in touch with the HR department at your past employers to make sure their records match what you've put on your resume, advises Allison. Sometimes, companies get the facts wrong for staffers' dates of employment, title and salary, she says.

"You may even have been dropped from HR's records entirely," Allison says. "This happens more often than you might think, especially in the case of mergers, where not all records make the transfer into the new system. It's also frequently the case with the self-employed, since many companies do not hold records for independent contractors or consultants in their systems. It's not great when a prospective employer calls and is told there's no record of your ever having worked there."

Let's say you've double-checked all of the above and everything seems to be in order. Perhaps your references are, for whatever reason, just not singing your praises as effusively as they could be.

"If your reference is anything less than glowing, he or she is hurting your chances of landing the job you want," says Allison. "You need to know that person is doing everything possible to make a positive impression for you."

If you have any doubts, consider giving a different set of references.

"The best ones aren't necessarily the contacts with the most impressive job titles, but those who can speak the most persuasively about your merits," says Megan Slabinski. "You do need to actively manage your references, but employers often do their own digging to find out more about candidates. Any and all former co-workers and managers could be tapped as references. That's why it's wise to stay on good terms with everybody. You never want to burn bridges." Too true.

Readers, what do you say? Do you have good references? Has a reference ever surprised you by saying something negative? Ever said anything not-so-nice when asked for a reference? What's the worst reference you've heard or gotten? Post your thoughts on the Ask Annie blog

March 30, 2009

Dave Morgan is doing TV?!

I've been Twittering quite a bit more lately (@aclion for those of you who haven't seen it - and personal is @seanwacl). One of the beauties of Twitter is it makes some of the most interesting/ well-known/ notorious/ cool/ awful/ whatever people accessible. Even with over 100k followers there's something intimate and engaging about reading Tweets from folks like Jimmy Fallon (I'm a recent fan, been to two taping's since he started - how lame is that?)

Anyway, came across Dave Morgan's handle and thought I've got to follow this guy (@davemorgannyc for any of you other stalkers out there). Dave's got kind of an iconic place in New Media as the founder of Real Media AND Tacoda, both of which sold for more money than I'm ever gonna see. Most of his Tweets are of the mundane sort (if you're reading this Dave - sorry, but it's true) but then this one popped up:

@davemorgannyc I'm back in the start-up world: http://www.simulmedia.com/press
7:47 AM Mar 5th from web


Here's a brief synopsis on Simulmedia for context:

Simulmedia, Inc. (simulmedia.com) is a New York City-based marketing services company dedicated to improving the relevance and effectiveness of program promotion on television. Simulmedia is developing pioneering predictive models and technology to help television companies deliver the right promotions to the right viewers at the right time. The company’s founder and CEO is Internet entrepreneur Dave Morgan.


First response: What the..? Dave Morgan is doing TV? Dave 'the most web 2.0 guy in the room' is doing TV?


And it got me thinking...


All I hear all day is about how much better the web is. It's hipper, cooler, more measurable, more actionable, cheaper etc. To the point that many of the people I speak to in the space think it's just silly to be advertising anywhere but the web. And I've assumed they're right - but are they?


I was walking past one of those phone booth billboards this morning on my way to work and it had an ad for the re-release of Pinocchio on DVD and I thought, hey, that's be a great gift for my nieces. Last night I was listening to Q104.3 and they ran an ad for some upcoming shows at BB Kings that I didn't know about, I went to the website and bought tickets. On Saturday I was reading The New Yorker (before anyone nudges my obvious pretentiousness right there, let me point out that my sister bought a subscription as a gift for my wife...and they have great content...but I'm still a little pretentious). The New Yorker had an ad for a museum opening I didn't know about that I'd really like to go to.

That's 3 different so-called 'dead' mediums that drove action.

Now, it's likely none of those advertisers will know that those ads in particular worked, and that of course is the issue with non-web based media, but those ads DID work.

All of those mediums also offer distinct advantages you don't get from the web. Phone booth ad: uncluttered environment. Radio ad: Active listener. Mag ad: I'm spending time on the page. TV has its advantages too; much bigger reach than the web. A certain amount of guaranteed viewing. Tends to be higher quality etc.

Maybe what Dave and Simulmedia is doing makes a lot of sense....

Let's not kill old media - let's make it better.

Thoughts?

March 25, 2009

The Q1 results are in and we killed it!

Had our morning meeting today and talked numbers - guess what? We had a HUGE Q1!In a down economy we killed it!


A lot of our clients/ candidates ask us; how are you doing in this economy? The answer: we are thriving! And that goes back to our core values and service.


After more than 12 years of listening, we've learned the space. We've acquired a firm understanding of the industry. We've actually gotten to know what your company needs, who you are, and exactly what type of person you're looking for. That talent comes from a smart, educated experienced staff dedicated to making the best match--for all involved.

Because of our innate ability to listen to your company's particular needs, we:

*Have always understood your company and your space because we're specialists in recruiting.


*Can look at a resumé, speak to a candidate and intuitively match them and their skills with the culture and personality of the firm.


*Have negotiated well over $60 million in payroll and compensation packages since 1996.


*Focused our efforts on your space through our vast database of over 90,000 qualified candidates.


* Built strong, long-term relationships between our industry-savvy recruiters and our trusted partners to source the best talent for top-growth companies and help them maintain their competitive edges.


*Used industry-leading methodology and cutting-edge technology to get the best staff on the job, fast, to speed the recruitment process and enhance efficiencies.


*Created an unparalleled network of companies and clients.


*Recently doubled our staff and took over an entire floor in mid-town Manhattan


Here's what it comes down to


Companies need recruiters who have deep relationships and who can network with passive candidates and bring the opportunities to them.

That's what has allowed us to grow and succeed in 2009!

Congratulations to the whole AC Lion team.
Alan Cutter; Bonnie Zaben; Mike Adler; Dan Goldsmith; Edna Brown; Ted O'Brien; Josh Marmer; Eve Stieglitz; Nadav Geft; Matt Devlin; Dana Lupton; David Shadpour; Chris Masters; Asher Abraham; Dani Shapiro; Sean Weinberg

and our super crew of interns!:
Adira Katlowitz;
Ed Butterman;
Elliot Friedman

Special shout out to Josh Marmer who has had a very strong quarter!

March 20, 2009

Dan Goldsmith Featured on DigiDay

Our very own Managing Big Kahuna Meister; Dan Goldsmith has an article out on ' Precision Guided Resumes' in this past Wednesday's DigiDay.

Find it here: Precision Guided Resumes Part II- Visual Formatting

Here are some tasty morsels for those of you like myself who are too lazy to read entire articles. I am the facebook generation.

• Hierarchy and outline structure will lead the reader along in an effortless way. Be certain the supervisory logic is established and communicated with minimal effort on behalf of the person reading your resume.

• Be consistent in convention throughout the entire resume. If you are spelling the name of the state “New York” in one part of your resume then you’d better use “Illinois” or “Ohio” for other locations –v- Ill or Oh. Every little convention you assume must be 100% consistent bottom to top. Having read resumes for the last 8 years I can tell you that constancy and structure connote professionalism, specificity and impact and generally set the right tone.

• Consider use of indents and bullets to transition from general to specific components of each job presentation. As well a discreet use of bold and italics are easy ways to give the resume flow and contour.

• Size may not matter but balance sure does. Keep bulleted paragraphs balanced in terms of the amount of space each consumes. Resource planning is critical for the appropriate visual impact. If you dump 9 bullets on one job and only 3 bullets on another job one may be led to believe that either you’re embellishing on the 9 bullet job or simply have nothing to say about the 3 bullet job. I advise to find a medium across all of your experiences.

• Group your bullets in a consistent fashion. Perhaps the first two bullets of each job description will illuminate initiatives you were tasked with while the last few bullets will illuminate the net result of such actions.

• Test your ability to conceive and write powerful sentences and very accurate use of verbs. The most over used word in resumes seems to be “managed”. I happen to frown on this word because it really doesn’t describe, in a granular sense, exactly what it is you did. The definition of managed is “to bring about success”.



Nicely done Dan!

p.s. any of you going to be at SES next week? I'd love to meet up!

Tags:

February 12, 2009

Spam?

Outlook has a spam blocker - great! You can check what it blocks, it takes time before auto deleting, and you can release to email easily. Sure it doesn't block as thoroughly as you'd like, but you deal with it, because overall it works....

Then your company adds their own spam blocker. It's super robust - it blocks everything!

That's fine and dandy..but it blocks too much of everything! I just logged on to my spam blocker account for the first time in ages last night and it turns out it had blocked literally dozens of emails from clients and candidates who I thought were not responding to me.

Then this morning I get emails from two contacts telling me they hadn't seen messages I had sent them months previously because my emails had gone into their junk boxes.

What to do? Any suggestions?

Tags:

BLOG SUBSCRIPTION

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Add to Technorati Favorites

AC LION STAFF/EDITORS

♦Alan Cutter (CEO)

♦Mike Adler (Managing Partner)

♦Bonnie Zaben (COO)

♦Dan Goldsmith (Managing Director)

♦Joshua 'The Red' Russak (Online Marketing)

♦Josh Marmer

♦David Shadpour

♦Nadav Geft

♦Eve Stieglitz

♦Sean Weinberg

♦Dana Lupton

♦Matt Devlin

♦Chris Masters

♦Josh Benporat

♦Joe Kaufman

♦Ted O'Brien

♦Edna Brown

♦Associate(s): Adam Cohen

OTHER BLOGS

Home | About Us | Employers | Candidates | Interactive | eNewsletter | Blog | Links
Search Jobs | Mash Up | Site Map | Contact | Download our free Alexa Toolbar

 
Copyright © 2008 AC Lion. All rights reserved. Terms | Privacy Policy